Excuse me. Don't this subject 11.07.2015, 20:28, "Petr Umelov" <[email protected]>: > Hello, WG. > > I understand you will approve this proposal in any case, you have made a > decision in January and should comply with formalities. > > However I see many companies began to open multi LIR accounts and receive > additional allocations. > > E.g. > netname: NL-PCXCOP-20150707 > netname: NL-PCXMAD-20150707 > > netname: DK-BORNFIBER5-20150709 > netname: DK-BORNFIBER9-20150709 > > netname: ES-RULZ2-20150710 > netname: ES-RULZ3-20150710 > > netname: ES-SUNNY2-20150710 > netname: ES-SUNNY3-20150710 > > Traders don't want to lose their profit and will begin to provide services to > help open new accounts for the same company and companies will be do it by > themselves. > > Thus IPv4 pool will be exhausted during 1-2 years. > > I understand the RIPE NCC dislike someone makes profit using RIPE's resources > but we should not make emotional decisions. > > 06.07.2015, 15:49, "Shahin Gharghi" <[email protected]>: >> Hi >> >>> I would be happy to support returning this proposal to the discussion >>> phase, but only if there are compelling reasons to do so. To date nobody >>> has made the case for taking that action. Although some have asked for >>> this, nobody has put forward anything to justify these requests. The case >>> has not been made yet. It?s up to you and your fellow travellers to make >>> that case. >> >> The problem is: The person who should justify the criticisms, never >> does! And he is >> supporting the proposal so that he will never return it to the >> discussion phase... >> >> -- >> Shahin Gharghi > > -- > Kind regards, > Petr Umelov
-- Kind regards, Petr Umelov
