On 31/08/2015 23:18, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > Can't have it both ways ;p As for myself, I would like to see > some clarification on this myself.
have cake, eat cake. As you point out, I changed my mind mid-email. It happens. >> asn transfer policy: added "scarce resources ... cannot be transferred by >> the resource holder within 24 months". I don't disagree with this, nor >> with the genericisation of this transfer restriction. > > I do (disagree). IMO this should be a separate policy change, not > something to be hidden in a huge re-work. The only thing that's changing is that asn16s are now be included in the 24m restriction. IPv4 addresses are already there. Nick
