On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote:
Hello everybody,
Back at RIPE70 Elvis and me presented some ideas about revising the IPv4
allocation policy (
https://ripe70.ripe.net/presentations/93-Last-_8-allocation-size.pdf )
Interesting presentation. There are some points there I was no aware of.
I would be interested in getting an educated guess what would happen if we
went with the following policy:
You get /20 to /24 depending on need/want instead of /22 for everybody.
This would apply until we have last-/10 where we then go to /22-/24
depending on need/want. We would treat recovered pool the same as last /8,
it's just treated as "addresses" so /10 is "/10 worth of adresses".
My goal is still to have IPv4 addresses according to this policy by 2020.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se
