Am 21.10.2015 um 14:40 schrieb Ciprian Nica: > > I would support something like this but with a few changes. I would set > some milestones, let's say by the end of 2016 you need to have 5% IPv6 > adoption rate or you have to return 5% from the IPs that were allocated > to you before the end of 2006 (so it would be a 10 year frame). Then at > the end of 2017 they would need to have 10% IPv6 adoption rate or return > 10% of the IPs allocated before the end of 2007 and so on. >
What about a new policy proposal for that? Please let me know if you'd like to work on one together. > Something like this would push the "old" ISPs to make the first steps > towards IPv6 and would not affect the relatively new entrants whom would > not make sense returning 50-100 IPs from their /22. > The last /22 (or even /21, which everybody can get then easily) shouldn't be affected. > I would support this, although I know it would be very difficult to ask > Telefonica to return Orange or Deutsche Telekom return millions of IPs. > RIPE NCC is not the police but we can all think of a way to implement > this, if the community would support it. > I'm no lawyer, but from a technical point of view it shouldn't be a problem for RIPE to disconnect them. Any I'm quite sure they'll act before that happens. Corin
