Hi, On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 04:18:44PM +0300, Ciprian Nica wrote: > Assignments are between LIR and end user and at this moment RIPE doesn't > care much about them, only, as you mentioned, that they are properly > reflected in the registry. > > If there were a policy already allowing RIPE to get back allocations, I > think the situation would have been different (I can't stop thinking > about my chinese "friend") > > Maybe it is time to create such policy. It will not be easy but maybe we > are able to come up with some rules that NCC can implement and get back > some of the space that we all know it's just waiting for a better price.
I could point out that *this* would very much be "retroactively applying
policy"...
(And there would still never be sufficient IPv4, so I think that's why
the community decided a few years ago to not bother going there - we've
discussed this at RIPE meetings every now and then, and decided to better
focus on making good IPv6 policies instead)
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
pgp8tPTIPQsne.pgp
Description: PGP signature
