Hi, On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:42:18AM +0100, Lu Heng wrote: > I can assure you it is not speculative(and I apologise if I give this > feeling in any way), it was an pure "academic" discussion about the > definition of the *need*. > > And btw I do believe people are allowed to ask dum question here and the > community should help people understand how things work, not everybody can > afford to go to RIPE meeting and not everybody can go to training, mailing > list remain the cheapest and most effective way still today to help people > learning.
This mailing list has a very specific focus: forming of new policies,
and discussion and answering questions about *existing* policies.
Historic excursions are *not* on-topic, unless it's relevant for an
ongoing policy discussion (which this is not, we'll never return to
that state of IPv4 plentiness - which I already told you).
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
pgp2i14FVlbZF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
