On Sat, 6 Feb 2016, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 08:55:45PM +0100, Erik Bais - A2B Internet wrote:
The policy proposal states :
> 2.2 Transfer Restrictions
> Scarce resources, which are understood as those resources that
> are allocated or assigned >by the RIPE NCC on a restricted
> basis (such as IPv4 or 16-bit ASNs), cannot be >transferred
> for 24 months from the date the resource was received by the
> resource holder. >This restriction also applies if the
> resource was received due to a change in the
> organisation???s business (such as a merger or
> acquisition).
Point 2.2 already states what is to be understood by scares
resources. All RIPE NCC issued IPv4 and 16bit ASNs.
In that case, there is a conflict between the proposal and the
impact statement. 2.2 seems to suggest that the NCC unilaterally declares a
resource "scarce" and the impact statement says the Community
does that - presumably through policy.
Why not re-word 2.2 to be the authoritative list of "scarce"
resources and any additions/rmovals can be done via the PDP?
I agree with Sascha that if we go in this direction the therm "scarce"
should be well defined in an authoritative way and also the proces for
updating the list.
Cheers,
Daniel
_________________________________________________________________________________
Daniel Stolpe Tel: 08 - 688 11 81
[email protected]
Resilans AB Fax: 08 - 55 00 21 63
http://www.resilans.se/
Box 45 094
556741-1193
104 30 Stockholm
