> On Apr 14, 2016, at 15:50, remco van mook <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> Dear colleagues, >> >> I'd like to reiterate my objection to this proposal. Anyone who thinks >> another block of 1,000 addresses is going to help them float their business >> is in my opinion delusional (because the next step would be an extra 2,000, >> then 4,000, ..). The problem is not that you're getting a /22 - the problem >> is that we're out of space, never to come back. I also object to the notion >> that new entrants who joined the game recently have any more entitlement >> than new entrants 2 years from now. >> >> The final /8 policy in the RIPE region has been, in my opinion, a remarkable >> success because there's actually still space left to haggle about. What does >> need fixing is the fact that there are a few obvious loopholes that are now >> being used to contravene the intention of the policy, and are being used as >> a rationale for this proposal.
I agree with Remco, and thus share his objection. Tim
