Hi, On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 05:23:11PM +0100, Aled Morris wrote: > The other objection (Jim) seems to be "we should be all-out promoting IPv6" > which I think is a laudable goal but unfortunately when used against > proposals like this one means that more recent LIRs are disadvantaged > against established companies with large pools of IPv4 to fall back on. It > simply isn't possible, today, to build an ISP on an IPv6-only proposition.
Please do not forget the fact that small LIRs are not *disadvantaged*
by this policy, but actually *advantaged*.
If we didn't have this policy, but just ran out like ARIN did, small
startup LIRs today would not be able to get *anything*. Now they can
get a /22. Is that enough? No. Can we fix it, without taking away
space that *other* small LIRs might want to have, in a few years time?
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
