On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Adrian Pitulac <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I see the same explanation again and again and again. But I see no real > argument from you guys. No statistics, no trending, no prediction, just > "keep the ipv4 last longer". Can you do better than that? > > Is this your best argument *for* the policy? That you haven't read enough posts well enough to find the arguments against, nor to find the statistics, the trends, the predictions? Seriously? -- Jan
