But Niall,
I have to admit that these two statement at point 5.3 confuses me a bit:
[...]
5.3 Address Recycling
Any address space that is returned to the RIPE NCC will be covered by
the same rules as the address space intended in section 5.1.
This section only applies to address space that is returned to the RIPE
NCC and that will not be returned to the IANA but re-issued by the RIPE
NCC itself.
[...]
sorry but maybe this feeds the confusion about last /8 appling only to
185/8 or the whole RIPE available pool
thank you for you opinion
Riccardo
Il 20/04/2016 12:50, Niall O'Reilly ha scritto:
On 20 Apr 2016, at 10:53, Riccardo Gori wrote:
Andrea, can you help me understand what happened to available pool is
any when 185/8 was reiceved by IANA?
I think this may be the wrong question.
IIRC, the triggering of the "last /8" policy (as it has usually been
known)
did not coincide with receipt of 185/8 from (NB: not "by") IANA by
RIPE NCC,
but rather with the first allocation by RIPE NCC from 185/8.
As Roger Jørgensen has explained, once the policy was triggered, it
was to
apply to all subsequent allocations.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
--
Ing. Riccardo Gori
e-mail: rg...@wirem.net
Mobile: +39 339 8925947
Mobile: +34 602 009 437
Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943
WIREM Fiber Revolution
Net-IT s.r.l.
Via Cesare Montanari, 2
47521 Cesena (FC)
Tel +39 0547 1955485
Fax +39 0547 1950285
--------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
above and may contain confidential information. If you have received
the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof
is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete
the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re-
plying to i...@wirem.net
Thank you
WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
