On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > > > New LIRs - holders of /22 - have all the incentives to deploy IPv6 > already (because they do not have enough IPv4 to number everything with > public v4 addresses) - but how would such a policy incentivize a big > content provider that has enough v4, is not growing in number of external > visible services (= doesn't need more v4 addresses), and has no v6? > > These are the sore spots today: content and cloud providers - and neither > are likely to fall under this policy. > > Thank you, Gert, for this very concise summary of the major grief that cannot and will not be solved, neither by 2015-05 nor by 2016-03.
-- Jan
