On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 6:47 PM, NTX NOC <[email protected]> wrote: > I oppose this proposal too. > > 1) it limits in rights all new LIRs. As I told in previous discussions > LIR stats show the same rate of new LIR registration (250-300 LIRs avg) > per month. It's about 40% of 185 is free and that means it will be about > 7000 new LIRs in it. That will be enough for 2 years, and after RIPE has > reseved space and reserve pool that could not be used for (as I remember > 2 years) and another IPv4 space will be given to market. > So there are enough space for 4-6 years with current situation. >
False. This proposal does not change when space can be used. > > 2) RIPE here is not to limit abilities of the members to use IPv4 > space. RIPE should give opposites. ISPs will take care about all others. > But in current case RIPE take part in business significant > parts and that's not good. > False. The proposal will not limit the abilities of the members to use IPv4 space. > > 3) Those policy add new fields and statuses to the database. And this is > not good too. System should stay simple and useful. It's not good > direction to make it more complex because there are a lot of question to > current one system. > This is the only one of your objections that has some merit. -- Jan
