Hi, On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:56:47PM +1000, Arash Naderpour wrote: > > This policy is not about "return allocations", but about reducing the > > burn rate by reserving /22s for those who actually want to run a network > > with it, instead of trade away quickly for a short gain. > > When an allocation is not transferable to another member, one day they need > to be returned to RIPE NCC.
Yes. But that's a side effect of not allowing transfers of these /22s.
Basically, the discussion *should* try to focus on this point, and not
run around the mill with non-sensical arguments.
- do we want to restrict trading of "last /8 policy" /22s, yes or no?
If we want restrictions, then this will have consequences (like, if you
close your LIR and are not selling off the whole business, the /22 will
be returned).
If we want *no* restrictions, this will also have consequences - namely,
some (few) people making money based on resources other folks have set
aside to be there for the long-term good of the RIPE region, which many
others see as immoral and abusive.
But do not complain about the potential consequences, please just answer
the question.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
