Hello,
I think your question is badly worded but answering it anyway, I do not
want to restrict transfers of /22s from the "last /18".
I oppose this policy.
Regards,
Radu Gheorghiu
On 06/20/2016 12:16 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:56:47PM +1000, Arash Naderpour wrote:
This policy is not about "return allocations", but about reducing the
burn rate by reserving /22s for those who actually want to run a network
with it, instead of trade away quickly for a short gain.
When an allocation is not transferable to another member, one day they need
to be returned to RIPE NCC.
Yes. But that's a side effect of not allowing transfers of these /22s.
Basically, the discussion *should* try to focus on this point, and not
run around the mill with non-sensical arguments.
- do we want to restrict trading of "last /8 policy" /22s, yes or no?
If we want restrictions, then this will have consequences (like, if you
close your LIR and are not selling off the whole business, the /22 will
be returned).
If we want *no* restrictions, this will also have consequences - namely,
some (few) people making money based on resources other folks have set
aside to be there for the long-term good of the RIPE region, which many
others see as immoral and abusive.
But do not complain about the potential consequences, please just answer
the question.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
