> On 20 Jun 2016, at 09:04, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > > But I'm close to giving up on this and calling a ban on further changes > to the IPv4 policy
+1 > - the "new LIR" folks here are accting in a fairly > irresponsible way regarding *future* participants, while at the same > time complaining that they are treated unfairly by the old LIRs - totally > ignoring the fact that *without the foresight of these old LIRs* you > wouldn't have any space at all today. Indeed. The irony of this is completely lost on these "new LIR” folks”. A possible compromise might be a requirement for future IPv4 policy proposals to show that they do not disadvantage future participants or increase the burn rate of the remaining IPv4 pool. Same thing really.
