> On 22 Jun 2016, at 21:49, Elvis Daniel Velea <[email protected]> wrote: > > let's also chip in the possibility to make /64 assignments while > redefining the definition. plenty that keep coming at the RIPE Meeting > with all kind of cases where they want to use IPv6 (PI) but membership > is not accesible. > > https://ripe72.ripe.net/presentations/114-RIPE72-IPv6-PI.pdf
I think that is a orthogonally different problem though, and therefor are two different policy proposals. Best Regards, - kurtis -
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
