On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Richard Hartmann <richih.mailingl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I support this proposal. To qualify my +1, while I do get the argument that this will not entirely stop hogging and speculation, it's at least a step in the right direction. Even considering Ricardo's emails, I don't see a hard argument against this proposal as it's easily possible to set up the downstream LIR earlier if they anticipate the need, anyway. To me, the pros outweigh the possible cons, and it's an overall improvement. Richard
