Hi list,
I support this proposal. It's seems logical and needed modify.
Simple and easy clarification to avoid misunderstading in
interpretation. Well done thank you Max.
I realized that I was proposing sort of this to one of my customers just
before summer season 2016 for beach side public wifi.
Project postponed to summer season 2017 for technical reasons.
I would copy the "Contractual requirements" under "New Policy Text"
since like this seems to be part of the modify.
regards
Riccardo
Il 21/10/2016 10:15, Marco Schmidt ha scritto:
Dear colleagues,
A new RIPE Policy proposal 2016-04, "IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification"
is now available for discussion.
The goal of this proposal is to define sub-assignments in IPv6 PI assignments
as subnets of /64 and shorter.
You can find the full proposal at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
<[email protected]> before 21 November 2016.
Regards,
Marco Schmidt
Policy Development Officer
RIPE NCC
Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
--
Riccardo Gori
