Am 20.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Ciprian Nica: > > In the past there have been PAs used as PIs so technically I think the > "allocated" part should be the one that's more important, therefore I would > support the replacement of allocated pi & unspecified to allocated pa. If > you ignore the greed then changing the status would not make any difference. > > Ripe has a relation with the LIR and the LIR with the customer. Changing PI > to PA will not affect the workability of the IPs nor the relations that are > already in place. Changing them to regular pi assignments would break the > link between lir and customer and give the enduser a possibility to make > money, nothing more. I strongly oppose against this. We are not living in a world where you can seize or just steal other people's ressources just to make your live easier.
IP PI *is* a company ressource and quite often there are no relations, as well as with other legacy IPv4. Period. Oliver -- Oliver Bartels, M.Sc. (TUM) + [email protected] + Fon : +49-(0)89-856305-0 Oliver Bartels F+E + 80935 München, Germany + www.bartels.de + DE129558421
