Dear WG
I support this policy. It seems natural to me that for allocation of subsequent space the same rules apply like for the initial allocation. It also helps organizations, that have received their space before the updated initial allocation policy can receive space based on the same criteria. Silvia Hagen Chair Swiss IPv6 Council -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Im Auftrag von Marco Schmidt Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. November 2016 14:20 An: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Betreff: [address-policy-wg] 2016-05 New Policy Proposal (Synchronising the Initial and Subsequent IPv6 Allocation Policies) Dear colleagues, A new RIPE Policy proposal 2016-05, "Synchronising the Initial and Subsequent IPv6 Allocation Policies" is now available for discussion. The goal of this proposal is to match the subsequent IPv6 allocation requirements with the initial allocation requirements. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-05 We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net<mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net>> before 23 December 2016. Regards, Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
