This is what I read in the PDP: It gives time to the community after the relevant WG chair declares rough consensus at the end of the Review Phase so that suggestions for any final changes or objections to the proposal can be sent to the WG mailing list. At this stage, objections need to be justified just as in the other phases for them to be taken into account.
I think text in the policy contradicting the goal of the policy and the Impact analysis is a very objective reason to do something about it. Saludos, Jordi -----Mensaje original----- De: address-policy-wg <[email protected]> en nombre de Jim Reid <[email protected]> Fecha: lunes, 15 de enero de 2018, 14:29 Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[email protected]> CC: <[email protected]> Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification) > On 15 Jan 2018, at 13:21, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Marco, > > I feel then contradictory this: ... detailed nit-picking of policy proposal deleted ... Jordi, we're past the point where substantive discussion of 2016-04 takes place. That's supposed to stop once a proposal reaches Last Call. I quote from Section 3.2 of the PDP again: At these stages of the process – i.e. after the WG chair has declared initial consensus or the proposal is in Last Call – complaints should not be about the policy proposal itself unless there are exceptional extenuating circumstances. ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
