On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:40 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <[email protected]> wrote:
> 1) When you believe you agree with a policy proposal and declare it to the > list (so chairs can measure consensus), do you “agree” only with the “policy > text” or with the arguments written down in the policy proposal, or with the > NCC interpretation (impact analysis), or all of them? Obviously, if I state only that I agree, I agree that the policy proposal as written is acceptable, and should be implemented, in light of whatever arguments and analysis have been made. > 2) What if the text in those 3 pieces are presenting contradictions or can be > easily be interpreted in different ways? In that case, I have probably not seen the contradictions, or don't think that they are contradictions. -- Jan
