Dear colleagues,

We are pleased to announce that we have implemented the policy proposal 
2016-04, "IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification".

The policy change re-defined the term "sub-assignment" for IPv6. The provision 
of separate addresses (/128) to customers of the assignment holder will not be 
considered a sub-assignment. More information, especially for IPv6 PI 
assignments, can be found at:

The archived policy proposal can be found at:

The RIPE Document, "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy", is 
available at:

Kind regards,

Marco Schmidt
Policy Officer

Sent via RIPE Forum --

Reply via email to