Am 19.05.2018 um 12:07 schrieb JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg: > My proposal is NOT to stop IPv6 PI,
Alternative facts? The title says "to remove IPv6 PI". > As I explained already, the intent is not to increase the end-user fees so > they pay the same as an LIR, but to have some "proportionality" and to pay > for the "real" NCC cost (which maybe still 50 euros, or maybe not, I don't > know that, it is something that the NCC should calculate). I've read multiple times that costs are out of scope for the APWG. So without a change towards a per resource fee structure – which is out of scope here –, the proposed change forces PIv6 holders to either become a LIR at 1400,-- EUR/year or abandon their assignment. Regards, -kai
