Hi Erik, 

while it would be a really tiny change, then maybe somebody else finds this 
useful as well. So I filled in the "Policy Submission Template" and sent it to 
Address Policy Working Group Chairs. 


Happy Holidays! 


Best regards, 
Martin Tonusoo 
IP Network Engineer 
-------------------------- 
CITIC Telecom CPC 
www.citictel-cpc.com 
-------------------------- 
Direct: +372 622 3321 
NOC 24/7: +372 622 3300 
NOC 24/7: +7 495 9815670 


From: "Erik Bais" <[email protected]> 
To: "Martin Tonusoo" <[email protected]> 
Cc: "Policy Officer" <[email protected]>, "address-policy-wg" 
<[email protected]>, "Gert Doering" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 5:27:14 PM 
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] definition of "ASSIGNED PA" in IPv4 address 
allocation and assignment policy 



Hi Martin, 



If you think it would make sense, feel free to submit a policy proposal. 



Please let Gert and myself know if you want to do that and we or Marco can 
assist if needed. 



Regards, 

Erik Bais 

Co-chair for the AP-WG 




From: Martin Tonusoo <[email protected]> 
Date: Monday 17 December 2018 at 16:20 
To: Erik Bais <[email protected]> 
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] definition of "ASSIGNED PA" in IPv4 address 
allocation and assignment policy 





Hi Erik, 





sorry for the late reply. 





> If you look at the text, would the LIR who assigned IP space to their own 
> infra-structure not also be an End-User ? 





I guess this depends on the definition of the "End User". Simply stating that 
in the "ASSIGNED PA" definition would make this in my opinion less ambiguous. 











Best regards, 


Martin Tonusoo 


IP Network Engineer 


-------------------------- 


CITIC Telecom CPC 


www.citictel-cpc.com 


-------------------------- 


Direct: +372 622 3321 


NOC 24/7: +372 622 3300 


NOC 24/7: +7 495 9815670 






From: "Erik Bais" <[email protected]> 
To: "Martin Tonusoo" <[email protected]> 
Cc: "address-policy-wg" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 1:33:13 PM 
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] definition of "ASSIGNED PA" in IPv4 address 
allocation and assignment policy 





Hi Martin, 



If you look at the text, would the LIR who assigned IP space to their own 
infra-structure not also be an End-User ? 

In the past, the LIR would describe IP space for themselves as Infra or 
INFRA-AW, but still give it the status Assigned PA. 



Something along the lines of this example : [ 
https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/#/lookup?source=ripe&key=178.249.152.0%20-%20178.249.152.127&type=inetnum
 | 
https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/#/lookup?source=ripe&key=178.249.152.0%20-%20178.249.152.127&type=inetnum
 ] 



Regards, 

Erik Bais 






From: address-policy-wg <[email protected]> on behalf of 
Martin Tonusoo <[email protected]> 
Date: Tuesday 13 November 2018 at 13:42 
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Subject: [address-policy-wg] definition of "ASSIGNED PA" in IPv4 address 
allocation and assignment policy 





Hello, 





according to "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC 
Service Region"(ripe-708) document, the "status" attribute value "ASSIGNED PA" 
has a definition of "This address space has been assigned to an End User for 
use with services provided by the issuing LIR". As "ASSIGNED PA" should also be 
used for assignments for LIR own infrastructure, then isn't the definition of 
"This address space has been assigned to the issuing LIR infrastructure or End 
User for use with services provided by the issuing LIR." bit more accurate? 











Best regards, 


Martin Tonusoo 


IP Network Engineer 


-------------------------- 


CITIC Telecom CPC 


www.citictel-cpc.com 


-------------------------- 


Direct: +372 622 3321 


NOC 24/7: +372 622 3300 


NOC 24/7: +7 495 9815670 







Reply via email to