Hello, On 2/8/19 9:15 AM, Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg wrote: >> I think only one reason, which will really boost IPv6 adoption is real >> exhaustion of IPv4 pool within our (RIPE) region. > I also would like to see a stronger IPv6 adoption, and reach the point > where IPv6 packets become dominant (i.e. >50%) and at a later stage > reach a point where IPv4 routers/services/everything could be > disconnected because they weren't useful anymore.
Since there're happy-eyeball RFC implementations, it's somewhat harder to perform such measurments. But I think IPv6 adoption was boosted in regions, where IPv4 pool dried. >> 2019-02 proposal is just delay this (and allowing more newcomers to >> start their bussiness), nothing else. > The core purpose of 2019-02 is to allow (more) newcomers to access a > tiny bit of IPv4 address space so their (hopefully IPv6-enabled) > infrastructure will have path to the IPv4-only world (without going to > the market). Yes, I understand this purpose and to be clear - I'm not against this proposal (that means, I support it). /24 allocations for newcomers are also used within ARIN region (since 2015 depletetion), so this cannot be any problem with such limitation within our (RIPE) region. - Daniel
