Re: [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6

[Jim Reid]

> On 28 Oct 2020, at 12:51, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg 
> <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> Exactly, that’s the point, there is no incentive – the only incentive is 
> stockpiling, just in case IPv6 becomes scarse and may create a problem like 
> the lack of IPv4, even if this takes 30 years, or 100 years, and you want to 
> secure the funding of the kids of your kids by having a resource that then, 
> will be subjected to market price and transfers.

This is beyond ridiculous.

Why isn’t *anyone* worrying about the Y10K problem? I demand action! :-)

PS The “won't someone think of the children?” emotional rhetoric is a very 
strong indication someone doesn’t have an evidence-based argument.