On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 7:41 PM Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> C) IPv4 waiting list priority follows the size of existing > >>> allocations for the LIR. The lower amount of allocations, starting > >>> with zero, the higher the priority. > >> > >> if the purpose of new allocations is to allow entry, why would an LIR > >> with any existing allocation be given more? > > > > That would only happen if there are zero new entrants, as an LIR with any > > existing allocation would have a lower priority on the waiting list. > > i asked why, not how. imiho, the list should be for *new* entrants, > period. >
If there are no new entrants, why should any available netblocks be kept unavailable for entrants who request additional netblocks? Not that I think it will ever happen ... -- Jan
-- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
