Hi, On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:33:40AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote: > ok, i did it again, tried to fit a square peg in a round hole. while > the immediate problem is past, thanks to the ncc reg folk, i fear that > we could benefit from thinking a bit more about $subject. > > for a research experiment, we wanted eight or a dozen routable, i.e. > /24, prefixes which we would announce from various places in the > topology. each /24 would have one pingable address, let's assume .42.
This is a tough nut.
I can totally see what you do, and understand what space you need, and
for which times.
OTOH, I can totally see the NCC being worried about people claiming
"experiments! and I need a review!" and running their ISP for a year
on temporary space - and with the argument "I want a dozen routable
/24s", you can get quite some ISP work done.
[..]
> i am considering a policy proposal in this space; but want to learn what
> others see and think, and to see if it is worth the time and effort.
I want research and conferences and all these things to be possible,
with temporary address space, and policies to be fairly liberal for
"those good things".
The NCC needs checklist-able items to say "this is okay" and "that is
way too much space, you do not need a /16 for 6 months to run a
conference with 1000 attendees for a week.
How to codify this? Dunno.
Marco, Angela - what's your take on this ("feedback from RS" time)?
Gert Doering
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
