If you want to change that you are invited to propose your own policy change. Past has shown that changing one single thing in a policy is way easier than to change a couple of things at once.
> On 3. Nov 2022, at 22:11, David Farmer via address-policy-wg > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Finally, maybe there should be a maximum allocation size of /24. An IXP that > is successful enough to need more than a /24 probably can afford to go to the > marketplace for the additional IPv4 address space it needs. This reserved > pool should be there to facilitate new IXPs and get them to a critical mass > of suitability. Not to facilitate the growth of the largest IXPs. -- Wolfgang Tremmel Phone +49 69 1730902 0 | [email protected] Executive Directors: Ivaylo Ivanov and Sebastian Seifert | Trade Registry: AG Cologne, HRB 51135 DE-CIX Management GmbH | Lindleystrasse 12 | 60314 Frankfurt am Main | Germany | www.de-cix.net -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
