Angela Dall'Ara wrote on 09/01/2023 10:40:
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four-week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide feedback to the proposer.
not sure if this comment is in time, but the text contains:
Assignments strictly larger than a /24 will only be made to IXPs that offer the exchange of IPv4 routing information over IPv6 at their route servers
As far as I understand, this protocol is not widely deployed in IXPs, nor is it widely tested in inter-AS production environments. It would be concerning if an untested protocol were mandated as a production requirement in a RIR addressing policy document.
Before continuing down this path, could the authors provide information on how this protocol works in production environments?
Nick -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
