Hi All,
I would like to express my support to this proposal.
It doesn't seem to tackle recovering IXP assignments made to orgs which
are not really operating as IXPs, but is definitely a step in a positive
direction.
Best Regards,
Carlos
On Mon, 6 Mar 2023, Angela Dall'Ara wrote:
Dear colleagues,
RIPE policy proposal 2023-01, "Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a
/26" is now available for discussion again.
The goal of this proposal is to reduce the default size of IPv4 assignments for
IXPs from a /24 to /26 and clarifies the return of the
assignments previously issued for their IXP peering LAN.
Following the last round of discussion, this proposal has been updated and it
is now at version 2.0.
The main difference from version 1.0 is that IXPs are not required to implement
the exchange of IPv4 routing information over IPv6
before requesting an assignment larger than a /24.
You can find the full proposal at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-01
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four-week
Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide
feedback to the proposer.
At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposers, with the agreement of the WG
Chairs, will decide how to proceed with the proposal.
The PDP document can be found at:
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-781
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
[email protected] before 4 April 2023.
Kind regards,
Angela Dall'Ara
Policy Officer
RIPE NCC
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
