Hi,

I also support this proposal, after reading the NCC's impact analysis.

I was a bit surprised to see there is a /13 reserved for temporary assignments, and only a /15 for IXPs (just read also 2023-01...).

I would also like to add a +1 to what Cynthia wrote, even if this will require a version 2.0 of this proposal.


Regards,
Carlos



On Tue, 11 Apr 2023, Cynthia Revström via address-policy-wg wrote:

I support the policy proposal.
However, I would prefer to see the second paragraph of the proposed article 3.3 
reworded. Currently it's just one really long sentence
and it was a bit difficult for me to read. I'm pretty sure that I got the point 
but I think it should be improved and disambiguated a
bit.

-Cynthia

On Mon, 3 Apr 2023, 11:04 Angela Dall'Ara, <[email protected]> wrote:

      Dear colleagues,

       

      Policy proposal 2023-02, "Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments", 
is now in the Review Phase.

       

      This policy proposal recommends setting the minimum assignment size for 
IPv4 temporary assignments to a /24, while still
      allowing for a smaller assignment if requested by the End User. This 
policy proposal also allows routing requirements to
      justify the request for more than a /24 for research purposes.

       

      The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this proposal to support 
the community?s discussion.

       

      You can find the proposal and impact analysis at:

      https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02

      
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02#impact-analysis

      And the draft documents at:

      https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02/draft

       

      As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this 
four-week Review Phase is to continue discussion of
      the proposal taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review 
the full draft RIPE Policy Document.

       

      At the end of the Review Phase, the Working Group (WG) Chairs will 
determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus.

      It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a 
restatement of your input from the previous phase.

       

      We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document 
and to send any comments to
      [email protected] before 2 May 2023.

       

       

      Kind regards,

       

      Angela Dall'Ara

      Policy Officer

      RIPE NCC

--

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your 
subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg


-- 

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your 
subscription options, please visit: 
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg

Reply via email to