On Nov 17, 2025, at 10:16 AM, Tom Fantacone via address-policy-wg 
<[email protected]> wrote:
...
Regarding RPKI and its cost-load, ARIN chose the path of requiring legacy 
holders to sign a Registration Services Agreement and relinquish legacy status 
to receive RPKI services.  While this incentivizes entities to become ARIN 
members and reduces the amount of legacy space out there, it also incentivizes 
legacy holders who wish to remain legacy holders to forego RPKI entirely, 
reducing RPKI adoption.

I’d like to take a moment to clarify ARIN’s handling of legacy resource holders 
over time, as I’ve heard occasional confusion and want to ensure everyone is 
working from the same base of background information.

ARIN was formed as the successor registry for the number registry services 
previously performed by the InterNIC (which at the time was operated by Network 
Solutions, Inc. under a cooperative agreement with the US National Science 
Foundation.) When ARIN was established, it was agreed that organizations 
already holding number resources in the registry would continue to receive 
registry services without the need to enter into an agreement or pay fees. 
Going forward, however, the registry would operate on a contractual, 
cost-recovery basis, with parties receiving new number resources entering into 
a services agreement and paying associated fees. On ARIN’s first day of 
operation, therefore, zero percent of the number resources in the registry were 
under agreement, and they were all considered to be “legacy number resources” – 
defined as the number resources in the registry held by organizations at the 
time ARIN’s formation, and again with the understanding being that those 
organization would continue to receive registry services from ARIN for those 
resources without fee or contract.  For legacy resource holders that undergo 
mergers or acquisitions, ARIN continues to provide their legal successor with 
these basic registry services for their legacy resources without fee or 
contract.   For resources transferred to others, they are not legacy number 
resources since they no longer held by the organization that was receiving 
registry services at the time of ARIN’s formation.

ARIN created a version of its Registration Services Agreement, the LRSA, with 
more favorable terms and fees, and has always encouraged legacy resource 
holders to bring their resources under agreement. ARIN operates the entire 
registry according to community-developed policy, so in the ARIN region there 
is no difference in policy application between resources under agreement and 
those without; i.e. having a registry services agreement simply provides 
contractual certainty regarding rights, services, and fees that a legacy 
resource holder might otherwise lack.   The LRSA was similar to the RSA, but 
the earliest versions of these agreements were quite conservative due to the 
fledgling nature of the registry. This posed little difficulty for 
organizations that received resources directly from ARIN, but some legacy 
holders – whose resources originated from ARIN’s predecessor registries – found 
certain terms to be an impediment to entering an agreement. Over time, as the 
Internet number registry system matured, ARIN released successive versions of 
both the RSA and LRSA with more customer-friendly terms, ultimately harmonizing 
them into a single agreement (RSA Version 12.0 / LRSA Version 4.0) effective 7 
October 2015.

Throughout this period, the ARIN Board of Trustees has consistently maintained 
that all legacy resource holders continue to receive the same basic services – 
including update of registry records via ARIN Online, Whois/RDAP publication, 
reverse DNS, and related functions – but that organizations wishing to access 
advanced services whose development has been funded by the community (such as 
RPKI) should enter into an agreement and pay fees like any other organization 
benefiting from those services. Even this principle was generally not 
contentious and many legacy resource holders brought their resources under 
agreement.  However, some legacy holders remained concerned about specific RSA 
provisions that did not align with their particular view of their rights in 
their legacy number resources, particularly when combined with the inability to 
revert to a prior “uncontracted” state if ARIN were to make some adverse fee, 
service, or policy changes in the future.

ARIN made additional refinements in subsequent RSA versions, culminating in 
Version 14.0 – released on 15 August 2025 – which addresses many of these 
long-standing concerns, including a provision allowing for return to prior 
uncontracted status as a result of an adverse change at the registry. We have 
since seen a dramatic increase in legacy resource holders choosing to bring 
their resources under agreement, and at this point more than 93 percent of the 
number resources in the ARIN registry are under agreement.

None of the above should be construed as a statement in favor or opposed to any 
policy or practice in the RIPE region, but rather just an attempt to provide a 
common foundation for informed discourse to the extent that ARIN and our legacy 
number resource practices should happen to arise…  :-)



Thanks!

/John

John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers

-----
To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, 
please visit: 
https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/address-policy-wg.ripe.net/
As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the 
email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. 
More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/

Reply via email to