hi tli, < curiousity >
i can certainly understand your desire for geographic aggregation in this case. those are some long thin wires. though i note that geo aggregation has not worked out in the past. and i still have the bad taste of the ipv6 attempt in my mouth. but do you think there is real hope that, in this case, the cost of moving from one location to another makes moving so rare that it will dwarf the painful renumebering problem? is aggregation worth the renumbering pain? randy, with no opinion above layer six ----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/address-policy-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
