On 01/30/2014 12:52 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: >> Not terrible at all, quite elegant actually. > > As a hack -- yes, maybe.
Sorry, you made it sound really bad, but the solution was elegant. > As a real solution for 2.20+ -- I hope we can do better. > Besides, adding an interceptor to __tls_get_addr means that dynamic > TLS under sanitizers > will become even slower. I fully agree that we need a solution in 2.20+. Cheers, Carlos. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "address-sanitizer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
