Comment #1 on issue 262 by [email protected]: Detect stack overflow
in SEGV handler
http://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=262
Can we have this functionality in every tool?
We already have callbacks that install deadly signal handlers, and I was
going to implement those in TSan and MSan. But perhaps it's better to just
have a single SEGV handler to rule them all? We don't seem to need any
tool-specific code in it.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"address-sanitizer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
