Comment #2 on issue 289 by [email protected]: kasan: instrumentation of
atomic operations
http://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=289
What about adding support for inline asm into ASan instrumentation code?
Detection and handling of "m", "=m" and "+m" should be fairly
straightforward...
1. Assembly instrumentation is non-trivial amount of work.
2. We don't want to do it in gcc (clang if anything).
3. I suspect that we actually don't want to instrument most of kernel
assembly code (e.g. task switching, interrupt thunks, syscall thunks, user
memory access routines, etc).
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"address-sanitizer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
