> there are downsides: one bug may trigger another report Doesn't UBSan have the same problem?
> the user will spend time investigating more reports than needed. True but that would be a concious trade-off. >>> It will create more problems to users and developers than it will solve. >> >> Agreed, it may cause false positives, duplicated reports, etc. But it >> does not have to be enabled by default. > > These, and many more. Just FYI this works quite well for us in practice (we use patched gcc). E.g. I was able to detect and fix a dozen of bugs in large app in 3 or 4 iterations instead of 10. > I remain unconvinced... I was expecting this :) -Y -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "address-sanitizer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
