I can't verify it at the moment. But it looks good to me. Please send it to gcc mailing list for review.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Yuri Gribov <[email protected]> wrote: > Dmitry, > >> Yes, -fsanitize=kernel-address is highly desirable asap. Because >> current scheme is incompatible with inline instrumentation for kernel. >> So we need to start telling people to use -fsanitize=kernel-address as >> early as possible. > > Could you check the attached patch which implements > -fsanitize=kernel-address on top of userspace Asan? It worked for us > here. I'm going to send it for GCC upstream review if it works for > you. > > -Y > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "address-sanitizer" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "address-sanitizer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
