On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Renato Golin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 25 March 2015 at 21:40, Konstantin Serebryany > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Or we are stuck with 39 and 42 for a long time? > > Yes. > > There are a lot of production hardware using 39/42, we won't see them > disappear any time soon. I'd risk to say, never. After all, ARM7TDMI > is still one of the most popular ARM chips year on year, and it's > already 17 years old. > > If we want it to run on current and near future hardware, we must support > 39/42.
Then forget about Allocator64. We need to either use Allocator32 (which is fine, imho. it works pretty well on ARM, x86_32, MIPS, etc) or invent something else (but I can't see why we should do that). With tsan, I am quite reluctant to support 39, even 42 may be a challenge. > > cheers, > --renato -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "address-sanitizer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
