On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Hanno Böck <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 23:06:21 -0700 > Konstantin Serebryany <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You are the first one to ask. > > > > If we were to implement it, I'd rather have another flag, e.g. > > also_log_to_stderr (ignored w/o log_path, false by default). > > I'm fine with that, too. Would be great if you could implement that. > > The code is already too complicated. If we are to add any additional complexity, we at least need to understand why that's needed. > The other solution would be a bit more flexible, as it could also > specify multiple log files, but I don't need that. > > -- > Hanno Böck > http://hboeck.de/ > > mail/jabber: [email protected] > GPG: BBB51E42 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "address-sanitizer" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "address-sanitizer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
