Ciao Alexis! Quick question: I just had a quick view, but is the 2.4.32-i386-1.1-00 backport already based on 2.6.14-i386-1.1-01 ? (or on 2.6.14-i386-1.1-00 ?)
If the first one is the case, wouldn't it be better to name it 2.4.32-i386-1.1-01 ? Sure 2.4.32-i386-1.1-00 would be missing but people immediately get the idea that the API, the behaviour is the same in the 2.6 version (and it also includes the bug-fixes from 00 to 01). Thanks, Happy New Year and best regards, Hannes.
