On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 08:59 -0400, J.D. Yamokoski wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 22:27 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > 
> >> Ok, thanks. Just for the purpose of finding some grip on this issue,
> >> could you:
> >> 1) apply the patch below; I suspect some unwanted IRQ migration issue,
> >> but can't prove it right now.
> >> 2) if this patch does not solve the boot problem with CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> >> enabled, then does disabling CONFIG_SMP improve the situation?
> >>
> >> TIA,
> >>
> > 
> > Actually, this patch would be better for the purpose of testing.
> > 
> > --- 2.6.17-ipipe/kernel/irq/migration.c.orig        2006-09-28 
> > 22:28:20.000000000 +0200
> > +++ 2.6.17-ipipe/kernel/irq/migration.c     2006-09-28 22:30:13.000000000 
> > +0200
> > @@ -17,6 +17,10 @@
> >     cpumask_t tmp;
> >     irq_desc_t *desc = irq_descp(irq);
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_IPIPE
> > +   return;
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_IPIPE */
> > +
> >     if (likely(!desc->move_irq))
> >             return;
> >  
> 
> Real quick, does it matter if I was using the Adeos I-pipe patch for 
> kernel 2.6.15 when I ran into my problems? That patch looks like it is 
> for 2.6.17 - But I can try either one.

That should be ok for any version that implements the generic IRQ
migration code, and 2.6.15 does.

-- 
Philippe.



_______________________________________________
Adeos-main mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/adeos-main

Reply via email to