Pierangelo Masarati wrote: > Philippe Gerum wrote: > >> Ok, you were talking about the _previous_ implementation, right? > > Yes. It's been running for a few hours today, so your fix seems to be > fine; in any case, the tests will run overnight, and I'll let you know > tomorrow. I believe this issue could not be easily pointed out by just > a simple latency check. >
Agreed, we need to create a load that makes races on seqlocks more likely, and ideally with lots of readers delaying a single writer. > Sincerely, p. > > _______________________________________________ > Adeos-main mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/adeos-main > -- Philippe. _______________________________________________ Adeos-main mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/adeos-main
