We can't go with just '-' because a user can use custom properties from
mozilla, like -moz-border-radius.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
-oam- is ok with me, although a simple startWith("-") would have worked
just as well without binding us to any specific prefix. The only danger
would be a new style property starting with '-' being added by w3c in the
future, but that seems unlikely.
Simon Lessard
Fujitsu Consulting
Jeanne Waldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2006-07-11 14:51
Please respond to adffaces-dev
To: [email protected]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Proposal] new prefix-name for custom skin
properties
I submitted an issue about this.
I wanted to make sure we have consensus on -oam- instead of -ora- before
I implement this.
Key: ADFFACES-56
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-56
Project: MyFaces ADF-Faces
Type: Improvement
Thanks,
Jeanne
John Fallows wrote:
On 6/25/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for the proposal in a whole
+1 for using inhibit - I like it more than reset or null
Agreed. +1 proposal, +1 inhibit.
suggestion for ca new prefix-name: changing ora to oam (org apache
myfaces)
Yes, this is another part of the repackaging effort. Are we limited to
3
chars here?
tc,
-john.
regards,
Martin
On 6/24/06, Jeanne Waldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I have another skinning proposal. This is a useful feature that is in
xss that I think we should port to skinning css. It is the css
property
resetting feature.
A bit of background first. Trinidad defines a base skin. We call this
skin 'simple'. It defines basic, simple css properties for the
Trinidad
components. An application developer can create a skin, and this
automatically extends the simple skin. Think of the simple skin as a
base class in Java. You can extend one skin from another, but they
are
all derived from the base skin.
When a skin extends the base skin, it is ADDING style properties to
the
base skin's style properties.
Let's say the base skin defines the font-size for the
af|inputText::label selector. This means that your skin will inherit
this font. Your skin can redefine font-size, and put a new font-size
instead. But currently, you can't say, "I don't want any font-size
specified on af|inputText::label".
I'm proposing that we come up with a skinning syntax that allows the
person writing a skin to do this.
We have this feature in the .xss syntax. In .xss, you'd do this:
<style name="foo" resetProperties="true"/>
or to reset one property, you'd do this:
<style name="foo">
<property name="font-size"/>
</style>
How could we do this in css-syntax?
One proposal is to add a special property like our '-ora-rule-ref'
property. (by the way, we'll need another discussion on whether to
change the -ora- prefix, and what to change it to).
Here is a proposal:
.foo {-ora-inhibit: all}
.bar {-ora-inhibit: text-align font-size color} // inhibit/reset/null
out these specific properties
Let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Jeanne
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
