On 7/13/06, venkata guddanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Matthias,
I would prefer to develop it as a trinidad component. I am more familiar
with this environment and I have never looked at MyFaces codebase. I am also
not sure if MyFaces sandbox supports AJAX.
Hi venkata,
ok; stay with Trinidad, but make sure the renderer is "Faces Major".
I'll make it *compatible* with Tomahawk / MyFaces Shared.
And yes, the sandbox supports AJAX.
-Matthias
Plus Oracle pays by bills :)
Regards,
Venkata
On 7/13/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In that case we have *no* IP issue.
>
> I think this component should be developed under the MyFaces sandbox.
> That can also be a play ground for a more *common* base of
> MyFaces/Trinidad.
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 7/13/06, venkata guddanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wrote all the JavaScript myself.
> >
> > On 7/13/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 7/13/06, venkata guddanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I wrote this from scratch and only have a dependency on browser
> > > javascript
> > > > and SVG. I learnt that apache.org does not accept images. So here
> are
> > > links
> > > > to my charting images:
> > > > http://picasaweb.google.com/venkata.guddanti/Charting/
> > >
> > > When you say that it has a dependency on browser javascript, do you
> > > mean that it uses javascript that you wrote, or do you mean that it
> > > depends on javascript that someone else wrote? If the second, we'll
> > > need to consider the license for that javascript.
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
