Agent is for user-agent. but more finer than the JSF spec is ;)
On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don't know what that agent do.. so I presume you're right :) 2006/7/26, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sure, > > but that Agent stuff might be usfull outside. > TrinidadComponentHandler is only useful for Trinidad itself > > that's why I asked. > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why do you say that it sound strange? > > > > ... but how many AdfFaces* classes are there? ;-) > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > What about > > > > > > AdfFacesAgent ? > > > > > > TrinidadAgent sounds strange. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > After all is done, I setup a wiki page for a better orientation. > > > > this thread is just for being clear on names and getting feedback from you guys. > > > > > > > > -Matt > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > clazzes like > > > > > > > > > > AdfFacesVariableResolver => TrinidadVariableResolver > > > > > AdfFacesPhaseListener => TrinidadPhaseListener > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, > > > > > > > > > > > > why not :) > > > > > > Thanks for your input Simon. I'll do the renaming of these guys later > > > > > > to get some more feedback. > > > > > > -Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > That might be heresy, but I would use TrinidadLogger and create a new task > > > > > > > to convert logging to commons-logging and/or log4j rather than a home made > > > > > > > JDK 1.4 logger. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Simon Lessard > > > > > > > Fujitsu Consulting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > 2006-07-26 16:19 > > > > > > > Please respond to adffaces-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > cc: > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Re: Re: [Proposal] (re)naming issue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > folks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more > > > > > > > AdfFacesFilter => RequestFilter ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but what with: > > > > > > > ADFLogger > > > > > > > ADFLoggerRecord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/24/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/24/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > What with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <faceletHandlerClass>org.apache.myfaces.adfinternal.facelets.AdfComponentHandler</faceletHandlerClass> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am fine with TrinidadComponentHandler, b/c this is *specific* to T. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 7/20/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > For class names, I'm thinking that: > > > > > > > > > > > AdfFacesContext -> RequestContext, or maybe LifecycleContext > > > > > > > > > > > AdfRenderingContext -> RenderingContext > > > > > > > > > > > (the latter is currently a private-ish internal class, but I think > > > > > > > > > > > we should make it public at some point.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I like that RequestContext and RenderingContext thing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I also wish we could keep the "internal" part of the package; I'd > > > > > > > > > > > rather have: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.myfacesinternal.trinidad > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ok. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any other opinion ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... than: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.internal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Doing it "without the dot" forces all the internal code > > > > > > > > > > > into an entirely different directory structure, which is > > > > > > > > > > > handy for things like doc + inclusion rules - you don't > > > > > > > > > > > have to specify exclusion rules, just inclusion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/20/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > ADF-FACES-API > > > > > > > > > > > > > package > > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.adf.** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ADF-FACES-IMPL > > > > > > > > > > > > > package > > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.adfinternal.** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.internal.** > > > > > > > > > > > > > (note trinidad DOT internal) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since nobody seams to have a problem with the package > > > > > > > suggestion, I think we > > > > > > > > > > > > should move on on this task, ok ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > o.a.m.trinidad is also fine. Tobago does the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > they use also the myfaces specific namespace. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only tomahawk doesn't :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.custom > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but that is from ooooooooold days. Hard to change :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > More interesting are class names like AdfFacesContext. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Naming them TrinidadContext might not a good solution. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note: This class is *not* extending FacesContext. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ExternalContext might be a good name... > > > > > > > > > > > > > but... as we all know, this is already taken :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > further stuff: > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
