Hello,
+1 for the latter as well.
Simon Lessard
Fujitsu Consulting
"Matt Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2006-08-08 04:43
Please respond to adffaces-dev
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: SVN structure
+1 (non-binding)
On 8/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 for the later
>
> On 8/4/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Question:
> >
> > Are we better off with the current structure:
> >
> > trunk/plugins
> > /trinidad
> > branches/
> >
> > or with:
> >
> > plugins/trunk
> > /branches
> > trinidad/trunk
> > /branches
> >
> > I think the latter is more natural if the plugins have their own
> > release/branch cycle. It also matches up much better to
> > how Myfaces does things.
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
